File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View

by J Crocker - 1991 - Cited by 362 - Related articles

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View

Crocker J, Cornwell B, Major B. The stigma of overweight: Affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993; 64: 60-70. Crocker J .

Your browser may not have a PDF reader available. Google recommends visiting our text version of this document.

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View

by WB Mendes - 2008 - Cited by 55 - Related articles

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View

File Format: Microsoft Powerpoint - Quick View

Crocker, J., Voelkl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social .

by J Crocker - 1993 - Cited by 229 - Related articles

Social Stigma: The consequences of attributional ambiguity. P.I. (with Jennifer Crocker). August 15, 1990-July 31, 1993. $241800. National Institute of Health. .

OO22-3514/91/I10O Social Stigma: The Affective Consequences of Attributional Ambiguity Jennifer Crocker, Kristin Voelkl, Maria Testa, and Brenda Major .

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View

Apr 18, 2010 – (1991) Women's attributions Attributions regarding evaluator's attitudes towards women Attributional ambiguity Crocker et al. .

This “attributional ambiguity” (Crocker & Major, 1989) can occur for either negative or positive feedback and may impact the psychological well-being of the .

by MT Schmitt - Cited by 169 - Related articles

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View

Dec 4, 2007 – T he minimization explanation is contrary to Crocker and Major's (1989) theory of attributional ambiguity which argues that members of .

additional attributional ambiguities ( Crocker & Major, 1989). Among the usual array of potential attributional judgments is the possibility that discriminatory .

Discussion centers on implications for attributional ambiguity theory and . . A notable early exception is research by Crocker, Voelkl, Testa, and Major (1991). .

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View

attributional ambiguity. Perhaps the most hotly contested theory proposed by Crocker and Major (1989) is that of attributional ambiguity. The idea of ambiguity .

Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Jennifer Crocker, Kristin Voelkl, Maria Testa, Brenda Major in Journal of Personality .

Aug 1, 1998 – How low-status group members cope with attributional ambiguity has important implications for cognition, affect, and behavior. Crocker and .

by J Crocker - 1993 - Cited by 229 - Related articles

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View

[edit] Attributional Ambiguity Among Women, African Americans and Latinos. In an experiment conducted by Jennifer Crocker, Brenda Major and colleagues, .

Crocker, J. , Voelkl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The .

This ambiguity about the extent to which outcomes are deserved is hypothesized to be. . Authors: Brenda Major; Jeffrey Feinstein; Jennifer Crocker .

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View

Your browser may not have a PDF reader available. Google recommends visiting our text version of this document.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 502-513. Major, B., Feinstein, J., & Crocker, J. (1994). The attributional ambiguity of affirmative action. Basic and .

Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity .

Your browser may not have a PDF reader available. Google recommends visiting our text version of this document.

Attributional Ambiguity - Description: DefinitionThe term attributional ambiguity is a social . It was coined by Jennifer Crocker, Brenda Major and their colleagues.

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat

Sitemap