Other articles:
|
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
Compatibility with GNU General Public License is based on GNU list of free . Artistic License License :: The PHP License License :: Zope Public License .
The GPL Compliance Lab, licensing@fsf.org, may provide advice for complex cases. For Perl code, avoid the modules released under the Artistic license only; .
6 posts - 3 authors - Last post: Nov 16, 2002I know they are both open source, but what I want to do is release a script under a GPL type of license. From reading the Artistic License it .
Cisco End User License Agreement. GNU General Public License. GNU Lesser General Public License. BSD License. Apache License. Artistic License .
a) the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 1, or (at your option) any later version, or b) the " Artistic .
http://code.google.com/p/privaterepos357/. test. Licenses: Artistic License/GPL. Artefacts: TestCase.java. translate.zip. 2011-Jul-04. GoogleCode. TestCase.java .
Not only is the GPL the most popular license for KDE applications, but it is . you will want to choose the QPL (the Artistic license is not compatible with the GPL). .
This license is the disjunction of the Artistic License 1.0 and the GNU GPL—in other words, you can choose either of those two licenses. It qualifies as a free .
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
3 answers - Nov 9, 2009I really don't get the differences between the Artistic License v2.0 and . The biggest difference is that the GPL requires you to distribute source .
4 answers - Dec 9, 2009This license is a free software license, compatible with the GPL thanks to the relicensing option in section 4(c)(ii). What I can't tell is if the Artistic .
Dec 9, 2005 – "Most, though not all, modules on CPAN are licensed under the GNU Public License (GPL) or the Artistic license and should be stated in the .
Amazon.com: Open Source Licenses, including: Artistic License, Gnu Lesser General Public License, Mit License, Open Content, Open-source License, Q Public .
Mar 27, 2011 – The GNU General Public License (GPL); The GNU Lesser General Public . Do note that the Artistic License is considered non-free by the FSF. .
You may use "LPRng" or "IFHP" under either the terms of the GNU GPL License or the Artistc License. These licenses are included below. The licenses were .
With these licenses the distribution of source code is optional. Artistic - for the Artistic license and derivatives. Artistic/GPL - dual-licensed under the Artistic and .
The heart of the Artistic license is the idea that artists, people who create things, should be . Perl 6 and Parrot won't be dual licensed with the GPL, unlike Perl 5. .
by EM Fabricius - Cited by 3 - Related articles
90+ items – GPL/LGPL Software Download Site for the beat service.
Although we list the Artistic License as allowed on Google Project Hosting, only Artistic/GPL dual licensing is actually permitted. Sort by Name; Sort by Popularity .
On August 14, 2008, I did a quick check of Google Code, and found that they only permit the following licenses: Apache 2.0, Artistic/GPL, GPLv2, GPLv3, LGPL, .
b) the "Artistic License". For those of you that choose to use the GNU General Public License, my interpretation of the GNU General Public License is that no Perl .
In addition, this RFC proposes that the license of Perl6 be the disjunction of the GNU General Public License and the Artistic License, Version 2.0. .
The Artistic License refers most commonly to the original Artistic License (version 1.0), . under the Artistic License and the GNU General Public License (GPL). .
Artistic Licenses. [OSI Approved License] You got here because you followed a link to a license with newer versions: Artistic license · Artistic license 2.0 .
GNU General Public License (GPL) x . Artistic License552; GNU Library or " Lesser" General Public License version 3.0 (LGPLv3)32; Mozilla Public License 1.1 .
Jun 25, 2004 – The Clarified Artistic License is likewise a free software license that is compatible with the GPL. According to the FSF, it has the minimal set of .
The following licenses are in use for R or associated software such as packages. The "GNU Affero General Public License" version 3 · The "Artistic License" .
pkg-config The program is free software and licensed under the GPL version 2 or . . license is the Artistic license http://www.perl.com/language/misc/Artistic.html .
This is especially important for GPL/LGPL licensed packages, because of the . Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences BSD, AMPAS BSD, Yes, NO, NO .
Important Note: If code is licensed under a license other than an Artistic . The file is licensed under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License 2.1. .
License: Artistic License, GNU General Public License (GPL) operating systems Operating System: Not Available. 123 Flash Chat Linux. The website owner .
GNU General Public License (GPL) v2 . The "Artistic License" . . Oracle elects to use only the GNU Lesser General Public License version 2.1 (LGPL)/GNU .
Sep 20, 2011 – We normally use the GNU General Public License (GNU GPL), but . . We don't take the position that artistic or entertainment works must be free .
Jul 22, 2003 – Blitz++ is currently distributed under two licenses. . either (1) the GNU General Public License, or (2) the Blitz++ Artistic License, shown below. .
Allison: For anything licensed under "the same terms as Perl itself" there's no change at the moment. Perl 5 is still released under a dual Artistic 1.0/GPL license. .
Furthermore, the Artistic license is not considered free and GPL compatible by the Free Software Foundation, so it's not a wise choice, and the GPL has its share .
The Artisic License is half of the license of Perl 4, Perl 5 and most CPAN modules . The Artistic License is incompatible with the GPL, but it is typically paired with .
Must include license with distribution. To distribute under a proprietary license, FreeType License must be chosen instead of GPL. Netpbm. Artistic License; MIT .
The Artistic License is controversial and has been criticized as being "too . . License > GPL-Style Open Source > GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) .
See either the GNU General Public License or the Artistic License for more details. You should have received a copy of the Artistic License with this Kit, in the file .
Arphic Public License, Yes, No. Artistic License, 2.0, No, Yes, Perl, According to the FSF only version 2 of the Artistic License is compatible with the GPL .
Why do you have two versions of the license? What is the BSD license? What is the GPL? What is the LGPL? What is the Artistic License? How does the NPL .
Jun 15, 2010 – According to Allison Randal, one of the architects of Artistic License 2.0, "Artistic 2 allows for any GPL-like license, not just GPL 2. Specifically .
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
Aug 6, 1999 – The GPL is a political manifesto as well as a software license, and much . . dual- licensed, offering the choice of the Artistic License or the GPL. .
On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the Artistic License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/Artistic' License: GPL-1+ This program is .
Jump to LICENSE: LICENSE ^. This software is dual licensed under the terms of the Artistic License and the GPL-1 as described below. License: Artistic .
This has very little impact however since the Artistic License is almost always used in a dual-license setup, along with the GNU General Public License. .
Sitemap
|