5.56 VS 6.8 SPC BALLISTICS

Oct 19, 11
Other articles:
  • 23 posts - 12 authors - Last post: Oct 26, 2010I've seen the 6.8 SPC ballistics gel pictures compared to the 5.56 ballistics gel pictures and read up on the history of the 6.8 SPC, but this has .
  • 32 posts - 22 authors - Last post: May 28, 2010debating either the 6.8 or 5.56 for a long range ar build . . As for the paper punching 6.8 has the same trajectory as M-855. Of course it still .
  • 17 posts - 12 authors - Last post: Sep 10, 2010Can someone explain to me or point to a link that compares the ballistic .
  • Similar5.56 or 6.8 SPC?You +1'd this publicly. Undo11 posts - 6 authors - Last post: Apr 18, 2008This is a discussion on 5.56 or 6.8 SPC? within the Defensive Rifles & Shotgun . The round looks like a real scorcher as for performance and ballistics. . Would I be making a mistake to jump on the 6.8 SPC wagon this early? .
  • 12 posts - 10 authors - Last post: Sep 9, 2007W B 5.56 Vs 6.8SPC ammo test. . I highlighted their ballistics results at 500 yards, so you could see how each is doing out to that critical point. .
  • 10 posts - 6 authors - Last post: Jan 29I ran the numbers on JBM ballistics and it appears that there is little . 6.8 SPC Ammunition & Reloading; 5.56 versus 6.8 trajectory, AND the .
  • 23 posts - 7 authors - Last post: Dec 17, 2010Well the 6.8mm SPC is superior in every way, having the option to . ballistics at any range compared to something like a 77gr 5.56 load, and .
  • 5.56, 6.8, 308 rifle ammo test - YouTube Oct 16, 2006 - 1 min - Uploaded by Davidkxx
  • 25 posts - 6 authors - Last post: Jan 12, 2008I don't think the 6.8 SPC is gonna catch on any more than it has (which is a damn . I like the price of the 5.56, but I like the ballistics of the 6.8. .
  • 4 posts - 4 authors - Last post: Jun 29SBR ballistics . .6.8 SPC vs. .223. . for performance accuracy with knockdown power, especially considering ammo cost vs 5.56 NATO. .
  • Buy .223 Rem / 5.56x45 ammo at discount prices at Lucky Gunner . the Mk.262, with bullet of enhanced ballistic and striking performance. . 5.8x42 DAP-87, 5, 895, 2000, heavy ball from machine gun or sniper rifle barrel . The 6.8 Rem SPC is, to certain extent, a direct rival to the 6.5 Grendel round described above. .
  • 17 posts - 9 authors - Last post: May 27, 2005sup Smoking have you had thoughts on the 6.8 ammo or at least about the new improved m14 . . 5.56 NATO 6.8 SPC 6.5 Grendel 7.62 NATO .
  • 5.56 Vs 6.8SPC ammo test - YouTube Oct 16, 2006 - 52 sec - Uploaded by Davidkxx
  • 15 posts - 3 authors - Last post: May 16, 2006The 7.62x51mm or 7.62 NATO was in many ways the last battle rifle cartridge. The concept of a battle . The 6.8 SPC is basically a 5.56 with a bigger bullet in a caliber known for its high ballistic coefficient. This is presently a .
  • 6 posts - 5 authors - Last post: Feb 7, 2006[Archive] Pros and Cons of a 6.8 Rem SPC vs 5.56? . The trajectory of the metal case bullet looks like this: +1.2" at 50 yards, +2.7" at 100 yards .
  • 48 posts - 23 authors - Last post: Dec 15, 2007. it has superior stopping power, but the 6.8SPC is inviting and the 5.56 . velocity fragmenting bullets like HP's or ballistic tips/A-max/V-max it .
  • 6.8 SPC vs 5.56mm comparrison . bullets will also fail as AP rounds against even lighter ballistic armor than currently deployed isn't exactly a good thing. .
  • Jun 25, 2008 – in order to achieve significantly-enhanced terminal ballistics over 5.56mm . To utilize 6.8 SPC in his AR carbine or SBR/subcarbine (AR-15/M16, . employ a dedicated 6.8 upper receiver or convert their existing 5.56 AR .
  • Jan 10, 2011 – Read Part 3: (Direct Gas Impingement (DI/DGI) vs. . . 6.8 SPC will travel a similar ballistic path as the heavy 5.56 NATO rounds, and recoil .
  • 8 posts - 5 authors - Last post: May 4, 2010Who here has experience with the 6.8SPC and can shed some light as to the better caliber? . I own a 6.8 AR and cost of 6.8 vs 5.56 isn't much different! The only nice thing about . Just look at ballistic charts of the rounds. .
  • 10 posts - 7 authors - Last post: Dec 26, 2009Posts: 452. jforrest is on a distinguished road .223/5.56 vs. 6.8 spc . . Here is an old ballistic chart, it shows the 6.8 SPC at 2700 fps, that is very .
  • Terminal ballistics at combat ranges is the area in need of improvement, not . The 6.8mm or 6.5mm in a .223 case will not equal the 6.8mm SPC on paper but .
  • This added ballistic performance makes the 6.8 SPC perfect for home . match grade barrel with 4 groove / 1-11 twist, SPC II chamber, M4 feedramps, 16” or 18” .
  • Jan 10, 2009 – The point of 6.8SPC is: significantly better terminal ballistics against humans and animals . Magazine capacity is slightly reduced vs. . Reference Ballistics, Light & Fast 5.56mm _BC_ _MV_ 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 .
  • Aug 19, 2011 – The Taiwanese AR-style XT100 is chambered in 6.8 SPC caliber. . 5.56 or 7.62× 39? It is not . More ballistic energy and easier to suppress. .
  • The 6.5 Grendel (or 6.5×39mm) is a proprietary intermediate cartridge .
  • 5.56 77 grain MK 262 Mod 1 Vs 6.8 SPC Which has a superior long range capabilities? . ranges and more quickly (it has a shorter "neck" in ballistics gel). .
  • 6mm Vs. NATO. Posted by Andre M. Dall'au. Author Archive » Images by DoD, Andre Dall'au. Ballistics Battle of the 6.5 Grendel, 6.8 SPC and 5.56 NATO. 6mm. .
  • 20 posts - 10 authors - Last post: Feb 13, 2006Attached is a G1 external ballistics comparison for the 6.5 Grendel, 6.8 SPC, 7.62 NATO and 5.56 NATO from 0 - 1000 yards. All calculations .
  • However, they have a relatively steep trajectory and a rapid velocity loss due to . they were in the same class as the present-day 6.8x43 Remington SPC and . . with a far superior ballistic coefficient to the 5.56mm Mk 262 or 6.8mm bullets .
  • 20 posts - 10 authors - Last post: Dec 12, 2010Hard to believe the 5.56 is anywhere close to the 6.8 out of a 12.5" bbl. .
  • 6.8 mm Remington SPC (left) as compared to the 5.56×45mm NATO cartridge]] . . The 6.8mm SPC is not the ballistic equal of the 7.62x51mm NATO cartridge; .
  • 69 posts - 14 authors - Last post: Jan 23, 20109" Barrel shootout 5.56mm vs. 6.8SPC vs. 7.62x39 UPDATE. . 6.8 SPC Velocity at 15' Energy(Ft.-Lbs.) Group Size in Inches Smallest Largest .
  • 6 posts - 3 authors - Last post: Jan 245.56 vs 6.5 Grendel vs 6.8 SPC article/review 65Grendel Forum. . has about twice the mass of the 5.56 NATO, with ballistics superior to the .
  • 21 posts - 16 authors - Last post: Oct 29, 2010The 6.8 has some ballistic advantage but not enough to outweight the ammo . 5.56 is disallowed in some states for hunting, right or wrong. .
  • Jan 4, 2011 – The 6.8x43mm SPC was conceived by a U.S. Special Operations soldier in . in 5.56mm, 6mm, 6.5mm, 7mm and 7.62mm, a bullet of 6.8mm was selected. . Tests in 10 percent ballistic gelatin show incapacitation as good or .
  • 11 posts - 10 authors - Last post: Aug 14, 2010IT USES SAME RECOIL SPRING AND BUFFER AS THE 5.56MM. NO CHANGES THERE. THE .
  • 12 posts - 8 authors - Last post: Jan 10The question is, should the 6.8 SPC replace the 5.56 NATO as the . better option to succeed the 5.56 since it has better ballistics and terminal .
  • 34 posts - 18 authors - Last post: Aug 27, 2009You can load a larger bullet at the same or higher velocities as 5.56. . 7.62x39 / 6.8 SPC -- is roughly .30-30 terminal ballistics which has .
  • The 6.8×43mm (6.8mm SPC) cartridge goes back to the abortive 1992 .
  • Oct 17, 2009 – Anything above that affords limited ballistic returns. . The 6.8mm SPC doesn't stack properly in standard 5.56mm . 6.5 MPC or 5.56 NATO. .
  • 5.56 vs. 6.8 SPC vs. 7.62 - YouTube Nov 8, 2010 - 5 min - Uploaded by allMTN
  • Troy Lawton (Chief Ballistics Technician) and Cris Murray (Service Rifle and R&D . The 6.8 mm SPC cartridge is roughly mid-way between the M855 5.56 mm . It delivers greater energy at all ranges than either the 5.56 or 7.62 x 39 rounds. .
  • Remember the 5.56x45 that Remington morphed into the .223 Rem? . a .277" 115grain bullet, it's overall length is exactly that of the 5.56x45, or 2.26" to be exact. . Remington likes to compare the ballistics of the 6.8mm SPC with those of that .
  • 11 posts - 6 authors - Last post: Jul 5, 2007Recoil on 6.8 Rem SPC is noticably more than 5.56mm, but not stout . I'd say grendel because of the better long range ballistics, especially in .
  • URBAN BRAWLER In 5.56 NATO, 6.8 SPC Or 204 Ruger. Hand lapped Stainless barrel 16.5" Plus Brake OAL 18" .936" diameter. Available with Black Oxide .
  • Apr 4, 2004 – While the 6.8 SPC case probably holds more powder [according to a . 5.56mm round and the highly hyped new Remington 6.8mm SPC, resulting in . In ballistic gelatin tests, the Lapua 108-grain Scenar launched at a .
  • 20 posts - 10 authorsForums Future Weapons Chat with Mack 6.8SPC vs 6.5Grendel . .. 6.5 does have superior external ballistics than 5.56, 6.8, 7.62x39 or even most 7.62x51 .
  • 20 posts - 11 authors - Last post: Dec 2, 2008With a trajectory very similar to the .308 WIN, the 6.8 SPC provides almost 50 percent more downrange, terminal-energy than the 5.56 NATO at .

  • Sitemap