Dec 3, 2010 – Read in for more on the 2011 Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 in this . It shows the stats, a 725HP supercharged Challenger vs a 725HP supercarged Mustang . The Mustang 5.0 would be lighter, faster, cheaper to manufacture .

Jun 17, 2011 – 2011 Mustang GT 5.0 ( MT - Stock ) VS Challenger SRT8 ( Auto - Stock . Enjoy the 392, It is a super sweet car. I was just reading up on it .

Challenger 392 vs Mustang 5.0 - YouTube Apr 5, 2011 - 1 min - Uploaded by AUZO19

6 posts - 3 authors - Last post: Feb 82011 Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 or 2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302? . the new 392 srt-8. Even a regular 5.0 mustang will do the same thing. .

15 posts - 7 authors - Last post: Mar 20Maybe they can compare the 392 to a ZR1 next while they are at it since . .. that is in comparison to the LS3 Camaro and the 5.0 Mustang GT. .

2011 Mustang GT 5.0 VS 2010 Challenger SRT8 - YouTube Dec 16, 2010 - 52 sec - Uploaded by Brhoooom2009

17 posts - 13 authors - Last post: Apr 14I'm racing a 2011 dodge challenger inaugural edition str8 (393) Friday. . . The latest issue of Road & Track had a test between the 392 Challenger and the . than the Mustang -- it was very solid and made my 5.0 feel cheap. .

Mustang 5.0 vs Challenger 392 - YouTube Apr 5, 2011 - 36 sec - Uploaded by AUZO19

Jan 24, 2011 – Related information for 2011 mustang gt vs 2012 challenger .

Nov 24, 2010 – The 2011 Dodge Challenger R/T has a large, usable reservoir of torque . a much lower entry price compared to the SRT8 392 -- about $34000 vs. . . That's a pretty stupid statement given the 392 Challenger and 5.0 Mustang .

12 posts - 9 authors - Last post: Jan 14Page 2- Z16 Commem. vs. Challenger 392 C5 Z06 Discussion. . buy a Challenger over a Camaro and probably the Mustang 5.0 or Boss too .

3 days ago – Read the Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 vs. . . didnt come out till 1967, so not only is the new 5.0 Mustang has less power but is LIGHTER and .

20 posts - 7 authors - Last post: Jul 29The 5.0 Mustang has 412HP and runs the 1/4 mile in 12.7 flat (on average .

14 posts - 7 authors - Last post: Feb 25Obvioulsy the SRT392 is $10k-$15k more than the Mustang GT. so it's not really an apples to apples comparison. . but how do these cars .

Jun 17, 2011 – Read the Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 vs. . It's a super charged 5.0L Regular Stock Ford Mustang Gt engine… and second to compare you .

Jun 11, 2011 – Whats faster the 2011 camaro or 2011 challenger; challenger 392 vs . . In fact, the Mustang 5.0 pulls 0.94g on a skidpad while the M3 only .

4 posts - 4 authors - Last post: Mar 25Only 1492 Challengers like this one will be built, and Shelby has a cap of 2200, with only 500. Read the Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 vs. . SmokinStangs.com - A Mustangs Forum & Mustang Enthusiast Community . . Mustang Enthusiast - MAG · 5.0 Mustang & SuperFords - MAG · MOTORHEAD - MAG .

32 posts - 16 authors - Last post: Jun 23The Challenger 392 goes from 0-60 in 4.6 seconds . . He traded his 2010 Camaro in on a 5.0 and ran a 12.6 stock. Also you put them on a .

10+ items – listen to Challenger 392 vs Mustang 5.0, CHALLENGER 392 VS .

Challenger 392 vs Mustang 5.0 - YouTube Apr 5, 2011 - 45 sec - Uploaded by AUZO19

25 posts - 10 authors - Last post: Aug 2‪Mustang 5.0 vs Challenger 392‬‏ - YouTube . Watched a 5.0 and a 392 do a 40 roll the other night and it was about .

Mar 21, 2011 – It easily bests the Challenger 392…it wasn't even a fair fight. The only thing the . 02-shelby-gt350-vs-challenger · 03-shelby-gt350-vs- . It should of been the 5.0 mustang with the weight disadvantage. My point is I want to .

Compare the 2012 Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 2dr Coupe side by side against .

Mar 23, 2009 – The Mustang is smaller than the Challenger or Camaro with a much . mph in 5.0 -seconds flat and ran through the 1/4-mile in 13.3 at 107 mph. .

3 answers - Sep 22, 2007Top answer: If you're going to drive it as-is, then either will blow your hair off. But, if you're into tinkering & will be under the hood as much as driving it, .

Feb 9, 2011 – 392 Challenger SRT8 Dyno Test at Hennessey Performance: . going to continue chasing the more nimble Camaro and 5.0 Mustang. . 6.4 or 392, whichever method suits you, one thing's for certain: New engines = new fun. .

16 posts - 11 authors - Last post: Jul 12I been lurking around the forums for some time and have been deciding .

In a recent review of the Mustang GT 5.0, I alluded to it's desirability over a Dodge . If you judge a Challenger 392 as a competitor to the hardcore Mustangs or .

May 10, 2010 – With the Mustang's superior road manners and the Challenger's . . as the Challenger's, yet there's also more of the 5.0-liter V8's glorious . .. Well the New 392 Hemi Challenger will whip any of the Mustangs and Camaro's. .

Compare the 2012 Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 2dr Coupe side by side . base engine, HEMI 470 hp 6.4 L V-8 OHV, 444 hp 5.0 L V-8 DOHC . Compare the 2012 Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 2dr Coupe side by side against the 2012 Ford Mustang Boss .

Mar 11, 2011 – 2011 Challenger SRT8 392 now generates numbers that are on par with . The 2011 Mustang GT with its new all-aluminum 5.0-liter V-8 would .

Mar 21, 2011 – Video: Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 vs. Shelby GT350 - Ford Mustang Overload . Adding a Shelbysupercharger to the Mustang's 5.0-liter DOHC V8 .

Aug 8, 2011 – Dodge Challenger SRT-8 392 vs. . takes on Summit Point Raceway · PowerTV's Vortech Supercharged 2011 Mustang 5.0 · Step-by-step 2012 .

35 posts - 30 authors - Last post: Dec 17, 2010. would you choose? SRT8 Challenger with the new 470hp/470ftlb 6.4 Hemi Boss 302 with the 440hp/380ftlb 5.0 Z/28 Camaro with the 556hp/551ftlb LS9. . Those are the 392 Edition special color schemes. Quote Originally .

10 posts - 8 authors - Last post: Apr 5Just stumbled upon this highway pull video on Youtube. Not sure I totally buy the "stock" label for the mustang considering at minimum the.

Jul 21, 2011 – Mustang Boss 302 vs Challenger 392 vs Camaro ZL1? . To be honest, I'd even have the regular Mustang 5.0 over the ZL1 or the SRT8. .

Dec 10, 2010 – That's also quicker than any production Mustang GT or Camaro SS we've tested. The Challenger 392's prodigious power made its presence felt .

20 posts - 13 authors - Last post: Dec 18, 2010Good runs. Looks like the Mustang started walking away from the get-go, and just kept going. . 2011 Challenger SRT8 392--- 12.44@110 (first .

20 posts - 11 authors - Last post: Oct 12, 2010YouTube - Comparison: 2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 vs 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS vs Dodge Challenger SRT8! . Dyno: 392 HP @5170 RPM / 397 Lb.-Ft. @ 4620 RPM Camaro Club of Delaware - Under Construction. .

Dec 3, 2010 – The 2011 Challenger SRT8 392 is rated at 470 horsepower and 470lb-ft of . For those unsure, a rear wheel drive car usually loses 15% (or so) between . I should point out that the new 5.0L Mustang GT was also found to be .

14 posts - 14 authors - Last post: May 29YouTube - Mustang 5.0 vs Challenger 392‏ . weight is whats holding the .

Sep 26, 2010 – The 2011 Mustang GT, 2011 Challenger SRT8 and 2011 Chevrolet Camaro SS are . cars and gives a technical comparison. 6.4 392 HEMI vs. 6.2 LS3 vs. 5.0. . The Challenger 392 is simply an amazing piece of machinery. .

Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 vs. Shelby GT350 - YouTube Mar 17, 2011 - 3 min - Uploaded by RoadandTrack

Mar 21, 2011 – Adding a Shelbysupercharger to the Mustang's 5.0-liter DOHC V8 easily boosts the power into the . Video: Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 vs. .

2011 5.0 vs 2011 392 challenger - YouTube Apr 5, 2011 - 34 sec - Uploaded by gingersnake1

Jan 27, 2011 – Related information for 392 challenger vs boss mustang on Automodifiedesign. . 2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 the Muscle and Powerful Car .

The 392-cubic-inch Hemi V-8 appears first in this revised 2011 Dodge Challenger SRT8. Read about and see pictures of the Challenger SRT8 392 at Car and Driver. . Challenger SRT8 vs. 2008 Ford Mustang Bullitt - Comparison Tests .

Jul 15, 2011 – It does however sport 392 cubic inches or 6.4 liters of big block feel. . 3.7 liter V6 and the Mustang's 5.0 V8 the 2012 Ford F-150 rolls into the . .

Mar 21, 2011 – 2011 Shelby GT350 trounces Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 in Road and . test to involve the Mustang puts the 2011 Shelby GT350 head-to-head with . Nice read regardless, wish they would have used the new 5.0 or just a .

13 posts - 12 authors - Last post: Jun 13Terra confronted the Camaros SS convertible vs the Challenger 392 vs . . If you want performance vs. value, the 5.0 Mustang wins that contest. .

Sitemap