Oct 6, 2010 – 2011 Ford F-150 with 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6. . Another rung up the F-150 engine ladder is the 6.2-liter two-valve single-overhead-camshaft V8. .

9 posts - 9 authors - Last post: Mar 15I think that a 5.0 or 6.2 ecoboost will appear in the SD line in a couple of . Forget the 6.2L, I just wish they'd offer the 3.5 EB in the Super Duty. .

Twin-turbo EcoBoost 3.5L V6 Mustang w/340-415 hp . Compared to conventional port injection, direct injection produces a cooler, denser . 6.2L V8 590 .lbs .

10 posts - 5 authors - Last post: Jan 10If you were looking for a new supercrew F150 and could choose the 3.5L Ecoboost or the 6.2L, which would you buy? Just watched the video .

40 posts - 19 authors - Last post: Mar 15Doubt anyone can safely jump their ecoboost. 2. 3.5 vs 6.2 - People need to understand that torque is more important than horsepower figures. .

8 posts - 4 authors - Last post: Aug 15, 20103.7L V6: 6100 pounds; 5.0L V8: 9800 pounds; 6.2L V8: 11300 pounds! 3.5L V6 EcoBoost 11300 pounds. An eye-opener as the upcoming 3.5L .

15 posts - 10 authors - Last post: Nov 8, 2010I really want the Harley which means I would only get the 6.2 unless for some . . My bad combining the eco-boost 3.5L and the 3.7L. Something .

2011 Ford F-150 3.7 V6, 3.5 EcoBoost Twin Turbo V6, 5.0 V8 and . Sep 26, 2010 - 3 min - Uploaded by highmileagemobile

Aug 11, 2010 – The optional V8 for the high-end Platinum edition is the 6.2-liter unit that debuted . Finally, the 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6 brings turbocharging and direct . outstanding low-speed torque to help tow or move heavy payloads, and .

Will the 3.5L EcoBoost replace the all of the current V8 available in the F .

Sep 21, 2010 – Some simply weren't buying into the idea that the 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6 -- a . engine matches that of the larger 6.2-liter V8 engine option -- 11300 pounds. . I think Ford has done all of the right things for the last 3 or so years. .

Sep 24, 2010 – Ford's direct-injected EcoBoost V-6 engine resets full-size truck . $750 for the EcoBoost 3.5-liter V-6 and about that again for the 6.2-liter V-8. .

Apr 25, 2011 – EcoBoost 3.5-liter V-6 F-150 on the Superflow dyno. Both .

10 posts - 9 authors - Last post: Jul 132011 F-150 HD Ecoboost 3.5 V6. 2550 payload, 17100 GCVWR - Photo in . . Its a high volume engine compared to the 6.2 so it makes more sense .

Jun 14, 2011 – . F-150 3.7 V6, 3.5 EcoBoost Twin Turbo V6, 5.0 V8 and 6.2 V8 impressions . $700 is what i spend on gas in 2 months or less,figure $4.30 a .

2011 Ford F-150 to get Mustang GT's V8 and EcoBoost V6, plus two more new engines. . In other V-8 news, the top eight-cylinder for 2011 will be the big, 6.2- liter . Displacing 3.5 liters and packing direct injection and a pair of quick- spooling .

15 posts - 7 authors - Last post: Mar 9Imgaine the possibility of a 6.2L Ecoboost? Most people assosciate the word .

2011 Ford F-150 3.5 EcoBoost 0-60 - YouTube Mar 2, 2011 - 12 sec - Uploaded by mkm230

10 posts - 9 authors - Last post: Jul 132011 F-150 HD Ecoboost 3.5 V6. 2550 payload, 17100 GCVWR - Photo in . . Its a high volume engine compared to the 6.2 so it makes more sense .

Jun 1, 2011 – And when you consider that if you want to tow with the Ford F-150, your top two engine options are the 3.5 liter EcoBoost or the largest 6.2 liter .

May 24, 2010 – The rumor is that the new engine will be a 3.5L V6 with a twin-turbo. . While this new EcoBoost engine isn't going to be “free” – it's a premium . .. you opt for the 5.7L to 6.2L, or if you pull in either the 5.0L or 3.5L EB motor. .

15 posts - 9 authors - Last post: May 18Starting my research on a new vehicles to be my daily driver and tow rig on the weekends. I currently have an '06 Expedition with the 5.4 that .

Sep 27, 2010 – Think Mustang (5.0-liter V8), EcoBoost (3.5-liter twin .

25 posts - 13 authors - Last post: Aug 28YouTube - 2011 F-150 Ecoboost Vs 2011 F-150 5.0L . The 3.5 EB was a slight bit slower off the line than the 6.2, but pulled harder by 60' out .

Jan 7, 2011 – The 2011 Ford F-150 equipped with all-new 3.5-liter EcoBoost™ truck . with the optional 6.2-liter V8, feature EPAS, or electric power-assisted .

10 posts - 6 authors - Last post: Dec 13, 2010Ford Ecoboost Vs Ram & Chevy 4th Gen RAM general Discussion. . with the 3.5 L V6 EcoBoost and 5.0L & 6.2L V8s. These new Fords Rock. .

2011 F150 Ecoboost - YouTube Oct 12, 2010 - 2 min - Uploaded by pduval80

Feb 13, 2011 – Hi, the F-150 is really impressive with the 3.5 L EB engine, but my eyes are still on the F-150 with the 6.2 L V-8 engine. Either way, I think I .

7 posts - 6 authors - Last post: Jul 232011 GMC Sierra 6.2L Ford vs The Competition. . And we averaged 13 l/100km in the 3.5, and 19.5 l/100km in the GMC on the same route .

60+ items – . 6.2-Liter V-8 and 3.5-Liter EcoBoost specs .

Dec 10, 2010 – The 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6 will carry a $750 premium over the 5.0 and the 6.2-liter V-8 will carry a $1995 premium over the 5.0." -pickuptrucks. .

Mar 22, 2011 – 0-60 MPH, Ford 3.5L Eco Boost vs. . Again, IMHO. testing the eco-boost as built for the torture test vs a 6.2l Tow-Max equipped GM would .

Dec 10, 2010 – 6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8. doh's Avatar . Test Manufacturer/Engine Result 0-60 mph. Ford 3.5L EcoBoost vs. Chevrolet 5.3L V8 .

Aug 11, 2010 – Ford already is offering the 3.5 EcoBoost V6 in a variety of vehicles, . The fourth engine option for the 2011 F-150 is a 6.2-liter V8 engine. . for the EcoBoost or any of the other three engine options on the 2011 F-150. But he .

Feb 23, 2011 – The 2011 F-150 3.5L V6 EcoBoost engine runs on regular gas. . the EcoBoost V6 - which is more than GM's 6.2 V8, RAM's 5.7 V8, or any other .

11 posts - 9 authors - Last post: Jan 253.5 ecoboost FX4 vs 6.2 raptor? General Questions & Discussion.

Oct 19, 2010 – The blown V-6 produces 365 horsepower and 420 pound-feet of torque. . 6.2 V- 8: 7.540 sec 68.18 at mph; Ford F-150, 3.5 EcoBoost V-6: .

25 posts - 15 authors - Last post: Mar 156 or 8 pretty much means nothing. And I don't care what conditions, unloaded a 3.5L will get better mileage than a 6.2L. Do I really have to .

Oct 4, 2010 – Review: 2011 Ford F-150 (3.7 vs 5.0 vs 6.2 vs Ecoboost) | The Truth About . . F- 150 EcoBoost (3.5L, 6AT): The “Eco-Brick” certainly appeals to .

Jul 13, 2011 – F150 6.2L vs F150 3.5L EcoBoost . 2011 F-150 HD Ecoboost 3.5 V6. 2550 payload, 17100 GCVWR - Photo in profile .

Apr 16, 2011 – Watching Ford torture-test its all-new 3.5-liter EcoBoost V .

10 posts - 8 authors - Last post: Mar 12Doubt anyone can safely jump their ecoboost. 2. 3.5 vs 6.2 - People need to .

Oct 14, 2010 – Also new for 2011 are the 6.2-liter V8 and 3.5-liter EcoBoost™. . Best-in-class 11300 pounds maximum trailer tow vs. all competitors .

7 posts - 1 authorHas anyone with a 6.2 gm have a go against a ecoboost f150? I took an ecoboost for a test ride the other day and it felt strong, but not quite like my 6.2.

2011 f150 3.5L ecoboost vs 2010 silverado 5.3L - YouTube Nov 15, 2010 - 12 sec - Uploaded by Liventhedream951

Apr 3, 2011 – Is Ford's new 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6 worth its $750 premium over the . new 5.0- liter V-8 and does it perform as well as the brawny 6.2-liter V-8? .

Aug 12, 2010 – 2011 Ford F150 Get 3.5L EcoBoost * The powertrain lineup for the 2011 Ford F- 150 features four new truck engines: a 3.7-liter V6, 5.0-liter and 6.2. . outstanding low-speed torque to help tow or move heavy payloads, and .

10 posts - 6 authors - Last post: Jul 28This is a discussion on Ecoboost vs 6.2 raptor within the Ford Raptor . As for offroading, guess anyone knocking the 3.5's durability or off road .

15 posts - 9 authors - Last post: Nov 3, 2010The 5.3 competes much better with the 5.0 whereas the 6.2 is the new competition for the ecoboost or the ford 6.2. That is, btw, the only truck .

7 posts - 4 authors - Last post: Mar 5The ecoboost in the f-150 produces as much if not more torque than the 6.2 in the chevy or GMC. The engine also has the same towing .

Sitemap