Jun 14, 2011 – 2011 Ford F-150 3.7 V6, 3.5 EcoBoost Twin Turbo V6, 5.0 V8 and 6.2 V8 . $700 is what i spend on gas in 2 months or less,figure $4.30 a .

15 posts - 9 authors - Last post: Nov 3, 2010The 5.3 competes much better with the 5.0 whereas the 6.2 is the new competition for the ecoboost or the ford 6.2. That is, btw, the only truck .

Oct 4, 2010 – Review: 2011 Ford F-150 (3.7 vs 5.0 vs 6.2 vs Ecoboost) | The Truth About . . F- 150 EcoBoost (3.5L, 6AT): The “Eco-Brick” certainly appeals to .

Apr 3, 2011 – Is Ford's new 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6 worth its $750 premium .

4.1 Bobcat - Dual Fuel Engine; 4.2 5.0 L 'Road Runner' . Ford also built an experimental 3.5 L GTDI EcoBoost engine modified with E85 direct injection and .

14 posts - 9 authors - Last post: Feb 12if they ecoboost the stang how could you justify the 5.0?

10 posts - 4 authors - Last post: Sep 29The F-150's 3.5L EcoBoost engine is already the industry's .

10 posts - 3 authors - Last post: Apr 8I love the 5.0 sound but that ecoboost looks pretty stout. . . The innovative small displacement 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6 is rated at 365 horsepower .

Apr 16, 2011 – Watching Ford torture-test its all-new 3.5-liter EcoBoost V .

15 posts - 9 authors - Last post: May 18Starting my research on a new vehicles to be my daily driver and tow rig on the weekends. I currently have an '06 Expedition with the 5.4 that .

Oct 14, 2010 – Also new for 2011 are the 6.2-liter V8 and 3.5-liter EcoBoost™. . . 5.0 vs EcoBoost ---------------------- I stood no chance against the EcoBoost. .

Nov 1, 2010 – Read on for more on the 2011 Ford F-150 EcoBoost test .

How We Dyno Tested Ford's 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6 and 5.0-liter V-8 Engines. Posted by Mike Levine | April 25, 2011. Dyno-1-560. By G.R. Whale and Mike .

Oct 31, 2010 – 2011 Ford F-150 3.5L (ecoboost) 0-50-0 MPHby franklin880623133 views; Featured Video. Thumbnail 0:40. Add to 2011 F-150 Ecoboost Vs .

8 posts - 4 authors - Last post: Aug 15, 2010Ford expects maintenance expenses of the 3.5L EcoBoost V6, 3.7L V6 and 5.0L V8 to be reduced by up to 52% thanks in part to the longer oil .

Dec 10, 2010 – The 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6 will carry a $750 premium over the 5.0 and the 6.2-liter V-8 will carry a $1995 premium over the 5.0." -pickuptrucks. .

Dec 11, 2010 – Full course, Ford 3.5L EcoBoost vs. . reference 3.5L EcoBoost 2011 F-150 bests Silverado and RAM trucks with 5+L V8s in performance test: .

15 posts - 8 authors - Last post: Feb 21Page 2-Performance: 3.5L vs 5.0L EcoBoost (3.5L, 2.0L) . I also drove an ecobosst f150 4x4 and one with a 5.0 and I took the same route on .

Jan 11, 2009 – The twin-turbocharged 3.5-liter V-6 EcoBoost engine delivers the . . Talk about NA engines all The new M's 3.2L 333hp 4.0L 414hp 5.0 507hp .

Dec 13, 2010 – MATCH UP: The 2011 F-150 XLT 3.5L Ecoboost vs. .

Sep 27, 2010 – Think Mustang (5.0-liter V8), EcoBoost (3.5-liter twin .

15 posts - 7 authors - Last post: Sep 28The above link shows the torque curve of the ecoboost at part throttle and .

Aug 11, 2010 – A 3.5-liter EcoBoost engine, specially tuned and calibrated .

2011 Ford F-150 to get Mustang GT's V8 and EcoBoost V6, plus two more new .

10 posts - 7 authors - Last post: Feb 12The 5.0 is rated at 15L/100 km city and 10.5L/100 km highway. The ecoboost carries a $1K premium. With gas at $1.20/litre or so, if you drove .

25 posts - 13 authors - Last post: Jan 13I know the 6.2 puts out quite a bit more hp than the 3.5L (365hp vs . .. Just think what torque and hp numbers a 5.0L would have with Ecoboost .

Sep 21, 2010 – Some simply weren't buying into the idea that the 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6 . .. max capacity, and at 105F for this ecoboost v6 vs. the new 5 liter V8. .

4 answers - Oct 23, 2007Is Ford's 3.5L V6 Ecoboost really as powerful as F… . that the F-150 5.0L is detuned so much from the Mustang 5.0L. 412hp vs 360hp-what a .

Jun 1, 2011 – Powertrains include 3.7-L V-6, 5.0-L V-8 and 3.5-L V-6 .

Dec 10, 2010 – It's the latest phase of the new 3.5-liter EcoBoost truck engine's “Torture Test . grade of an average of 5 percent (meaning the road rises 5 feet for every 100 . Ford 3.5L EcoBoost vs. Ram 5.7L V8. Ford faster by 11.9 seconds .

Feb 18, 2011 – I don't know the weight difference between the 5.0L V8 vs the Eco-boost 3.5L V6, but I would suspect with the Eco-boost's intercoolers, related .

Jun 1, 2011 – The EcoBoost V6 in the 2011 F-150 produces 365 horsepower and a . are the 3.5 liter EcoBoost or the largest 6.2 liter V8 you see even the 5.0 .

Aug 12, 2010 – 2011 Ford F150 Get 3.5L EcoBoost * The powertrain lineup for the 2011 Ford F- 150 features four new truck engines: a 3.7-liter V6, 5.0-liter and 6.2. . outstanding low-speed torque to help tow or move heavy payloads, and .

Aug 11, 2010 – Ford already is offering the 3.5 EcoBoost V6 in a variety of vehicles, . versus a towing capability of 9800 pounds with the 5.0-liter V8, he noted. .

20 posts - 12 authors - Last post: Jan 9There have been numerous discussions about these two engines and whether the 3.5EB might be a decent Mustang engine some day.

Jan 12, 2011 – ecoboost problems; ford ecoboost problems; f150 ecoboost vs tundra . .. And with Fords new power trains (5.0L, 6.2L EB 3.5L w/6spd), the .

10 posts - 7 authors - Last post: Sep 7I am sure there has been a vs thread, but I would really like to find out from the new engine owners that previously owned a 5.4 what their real .

10 posts - 6 authors - Last post: Dec 13, 2010Ford Ecoboost Vs Ram & Chevy 4th Gen RAM general Discussion. . with the 3.5 L V6 EcoBoost and 5.0L & 6.2L V8s. These new Fords Rock. .

The DOHC 5.0L is related to the 4.6L and 5.4L modular motors, but with a larger . We had a chance to tow with Ford's twin-turbo 3.5L EcoBoost V-6 and can .

Sep 27, 2010 – The fourth option: Ford's 3.5-liter, twin-turbo EcoBoost V-6, . V-6 block and heads share some family with Ford's new 5.0-liter and 6.2-liter V-8. .

Sep 24, 2010 – Pricing starts at $22415 for a standard cab 3.7-liter 4x2 and rises $1000 for the 5.0-liter V-8, another $750 for the EcoBoost 3.5-liter V-6 and .

10 posts - 5 authors - Last post: Mar 10The price for the ecoboost option vs. the 5.0 is $750.00 not 3k-4k . .. Also, I purchased on about a month ago for about $400 over invoice . .

10 posts - 8 authors - Last post: Sep 8I've test driven both engines, the 5.0 and the Ecoboost. The 5.0 felt just .

Oct 6, 2010 – 2011 Ford F-150 with 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6. . 3.5 liter should deliver approximately 5 percent better mileage compared to the 5.0-liter V8. .

Sep 26, 2010 – 2011 Ford F-150 3.7 V6, 3.5 EcoBoost Twin Turbo V6, 5.0 V8 .

Apr 26, 2011 – Equipped with the 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6, an F-150 has a maximum . Compared to Ford's own new 5.0-liter V8, which in the 2011 F-150 is rated .

Jan 7, 2011 – The much anticipated Ford F-150 equipped with the 3.5L EcoBoost engine has . engine only costs $750 more than the F-150 equipped with the 5.0L V8. . can match the F-150 EcoBoost in highway or city fuel economy. .

Aug 10, 2011 – How the 5.0 will be on gas vs the ecoboost. I`ve always . .. I test drove the 2011 5.0 and Ecoboost Screw and the 3.5L blew me away! After the .

Ford now offers its twin-turbo EcoBoost V-6 in the F-150 pickup. . This also marks the first time Ford's 3.5-liter EcoBoost engine has appeared in a . For example, a 5.0-liter-equipped F-150 got 14 mpg in our hands, the same as this EcoBoost .

15 posts - 12 authors - Last post: Feb 24fueleconomy.gov states that the 2010 5.4L is 14/18, 2010 Sport Trac 4.6L is 14/ 19, 2011 F150 5.0L is 14/19 and 2011 3.5L Ecoboost is 15/21. .

Sitemap