8 posts - 4 authors - Last post: Aug 5Canon 70 200 L 2.8 (is) lens and shoot it at 135mm. What will the . You have to ask yourself: how often will you use the 135? That's a fairly .

9 posts - 5 authors - Last post: Jan 12I'd be looking at an 85 1.8 or a 100 2.8 IS macro or a 135L. . the flexibility of the 70-200's I'd never use one for portraits unless I broke my 135L. .

15 posts - 5 authors - Last post: Jul 1224-105, 16-35II, 50/1.8, broken 70-200/4 IS, 135/2 My shooting . All of this got me started because my 70-200/4IS is broken and I stand before .

15 posts - 15 authors - Last post: Jul 24, 2006I have both the 135L and 70-200L (IS version), and although the 70-200L IS is an excellent lens, awesome really, at 135mm, the prime is a tad .

Tim Nosenzo > 35L vs. 50L AF Speed. Tim Nosenzo > 35L vs. 24L II AF Speed .

10 posts - 7 authors - Last post: Feb 5, 2010To get the same framing from the 135 mm as you do from the 70-200mm @ 200mm you have to be 32% closer to the subject. That may or may .

This is a collection of mostly random images and video used to show differences and/or features of gear I have.

The Canon 70-200mm f/4 L IS is one of those lenses that just works and . .. EXIF data agrees with the settings marked on the lens at 70 , 100, 135 and 200mm. .

Mar 11, 2011 – By the way, by mkII I meant 70-200/2.8ISmkII, not a camera. I use a pair of 1DsIII's , 24LII, 35L, 85L and 135L. The 70-200/4IS, along with a .

7 posts - 2 authors - Last post: Jan 3, 2005For indoor sports on my MkII I use a 85/1.8, 135/2.0, 70-200/2.8 and 200/1.8. I find the focus speed of the 70-200 to be faster than both the .

9 posts - 5 authors - Last post: Sep 23, 2010Hi guys, I want to know which lens would you choose to use? 135L or the new 70- 200 2.8? I am having a hard time determining whether to buy .

Mar 28, 2009 – I'm having a very tough time deciding between these lenses. I've taken my body to a local camera shop and shot with both of them, but I'.

22 posts - 8 authors - Last post: Jan 22, 2009basically, because I own a 135L, and a 100-400 I'm fairly certain I'll sell .

The bokeh is not as dramatic as the Canon 135L (review here), but the 70- 200mm F2.8 L IS II is doing nicely - and certainly better than 70-200mm F4 IS. .

25 posts - 24 authors - Last post: Dec 12, 2010B) 10-22, 28-135, 100-400 for the most coverage (and if weight and size . If weight is an issue, I'll use a 70-200 for the long lens and throw in a .

25 posts - 4 authors - Last post: Feb 27, 2006I would guess the bottom one is the 135, but I would think the 70-200 should .

vs. 16% more buy. 58% bought. Canon EF 70-200mm f / 4L USM Telephoto . .. at F8 with the F4 lens maintaining more sharpness over all from 135 to 200mm. .

Jan 9, 2011 – 70-200/4 is small and light and 70-200/2.8 is big and heavy. . . The 135L is probably sharpest and the 100L least sharp, however the difference .

Mar 4, 2011 – I would think one is always better off with 200mm of native .

Canon & Nikon Digital SLR and Lens Reviews at The-Digital-Picture.com .

Feb 26, 2008 – I know the 70-200 is great but I'm not thrilled to lug it .

2 posts - 1 author - Last post: Mar 20, 2003where can i find comparison test between 135L and 70-200IS? is it > true that 135L (much) sharper than 70-200IS? .

18 posts - 7 authors - Last post: Aug 27, 2009Would it be so much more convenient? Or is the IQ of the 135 so much better that I could forgo the 70-200/2.8 and just foot zoom the 135? .

Canon makes four versions of the 70-200mm: f/2.8 and f/4, and with or .

10 posts - 4 authors - Last post: Oct 25, 2009I have a newborn shoot coming up, the 85L on my 50D is almost 135, and the 70- 200L f4 is a pretty strong lens, where as at the wider end I .

11 posts - 6 authors - Last post: Jun 1, 2010Compared to the 135L, the 85/1.8's colors and contrast feel flat. There's no denying the 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM is a more general-purpose lens .

15 posts - 5 authors - Last post: Sep 18, 2010If the Sonnar outperforms the 70-200, it is not "one of the poorest performers in the . .. Now i`m looking for good CZJ 135 3,5 or 135L maybe. .

20 posts - 8 authors - Last post: Oct 24, 2008Help! Finally I can afford a new lens but I just can't decide which one. It's between the 2 in the title and it will be used mainly for outdoor.

Billions of happy photos, millions of passionate customers. Gorgeous online photo albums. Protect your priceless memories. Buy beautiful prints & gifts.

Jump to Pros vs Cons‎: . this lens equal or above the other three 70-200 lenses in Canon's . as some amazing primes such as the 135 F/2 or the 200 F/2 .

This bag can hold my 1DmkIII with 24-70 attached, 5DmkII with grip and 85L attached, 70-200 2.8 IS, 35L, 135L, 15 fisheye, and a 580EX ALL in the main .

12 posts - 9 authors - Last post: Dec 11, 2009not sure where i should post this. i hope this section is okay. so i'm shooting my first wedding (helping out a friend, he'll be the main photog). .

Jan 22, 2006 – Wow. spectacular results re the 135 f/2. much better .

Mar 22, 2010 – From left to right, Canon 135 F/2 vs 70-200 F/2.8 IS vs the new 70-200 F/2.8 IS II. Click the (…more) button to read the review on this brand new .

15 posts - 7 authors - Last post: Aug 28, 2010Ideally I'd buy both the 85L and the 70-200 2.8ii, but considering their . . f/2.8, you'll get more blur with the 200mm than with the 135 or the 85. .

I think it's much easier to get a sharp image using a 85, 135 or 200 at f/2 .

Jun 1, 2009 – Latest: 2 weeks ago. Would you use this lens in a wedding? 135L f/2.0 vs 85 f/1.8 . Latest: 2 weeks ago. 135l vs 70-200 2.8 IS II L sharpness .

8 posts - 4 authors - Last post: Apr 8, 2008I have a sigma 24-70 2.8 and a 50 1.8 on a 30D. I want something on the long end but I can't decide between a 70-200 (canon f4? tamron 2.8?

15 posts - 10 authors - Last post: Jun 30, 2007135L vs. 70-200 2.8 IS??? Canon EF and EF-S Lenses.

Sep 11, 2011 – Flickr is almost certainly the best online photo management .

14 posts - 7 authors - Last post: Aug 26I used to have a 24-70 and a 70-200 F4 before switching to the three primes. To fund the 70-200 MK II, I would have to sell the 85L and 135L, .

Fast and super sharp. However, for financially struggling mere mortals like me, the big question is usually whether the 70-200L is a better buy or the 135L. We all .

42 posts - 11 authors - Last post: Jan 26, 2009OK, I finally sat down last night, took some time and made an attempt at this. The issue is finding interesting **** for a test like this inside at.

Feb 14, 2011 – My plan was upgrading to 70-200 2.8 from the f4 at first. Compared the quality of 135 f2 and 70-200 2.8 . slightly sharper..and faster. I haven't .

20 posts - 12 authors - Last post: Mar 6It has a bit more resolution and contrast as the 4.0/70-200L IS until 200mm and is at least . At 135mm and f5.6 the 2.0/135L is still a bit in front. .

25 posts - 6 authors - Last post: Jul 1, 2010I bought the 135L first and fell in love with it right away. I sold my 70-200 f/4 because I needed a faster lens for a wedding I was shooting -- even .

3 posts - 2 authors - Last post: Feb 10I have a 70-200 lens you mention, and yes it is a beast to hand hold. I don't do wedding photography, nor have I read the reviews on the 135L. .

70-200 w/o extender @200mm f/2.8, f/4, f/5.6, f/8, f/11 and f/22 . .. Searching on how the 135L + 1.4x TC combo would work, as well as with 200mm f/2.8 L. .

Dec 19, 2010 – depends really what you shoot, i got rid of my Sigma 70-200 .

9 posts - 4 authors - Last post: Mar 18Considering saleing my 135 F/2 which I absolutely love for all my sports stuff and going for a little more versatile lens with the new 70-200 f/2.8 .

Sitemap