12 posts - 8 authors - Last post: Jun 14, 2005View Full Version : 2.35 vs 1.85 with Constant height . With Scope I do .

. nearly as wide as those given in the widescreen versus P&S examples .

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View

File Format: Microsoft Powerpoint - Quick View

Bayer Leverkusen, 46.4%, 1.85, 1.85, 2.16, $ 85.76, $ 54.05. Draw, 36.5%, 2.35, 2.35, 2.74, $ 85.76, $ 42.55. Payout Percentages: Best Odds 85.76%, .

Other movies (often with aspect ratios of 1.85:1 in the USA or 1.66:1 in .

30 posts - 11 authors - Last post: Aug 26, 2007Very few movies are in 16:9 ratio compared to the 1.85 and wider movies. . The 1.85:1 and 2.35:1 (Cinemascope) ratios to which you are .

2 2.35, 2.39 or 2.40? 3 Lens makers and corporate trademarks .

Alkett's design was easier to manufacture but it also significantly increased the height by 50cm (1.85m of Vomag model vs. 2.35m of Alkett model). .

7 posts - 3 authors - Last post: Jun 7, 2002NTSC Anamorphic 1.85:1 vs 2.35:1 DVD's One click suites for DVD backup and .

15 posts - 5 authorsJust builded a new Medicenter and cant get to work. Tried any combination of: Coreavc from 1.6 to 1.85. Haali VS filter 2.33, 2.35, 2.37, 2.38, 2.39 .

77 posts - 33 authors - Last post: Nov 1, 2005View Full Version : 1.85 vs 2.35 . Mostly 16.9 but I've seen a few croped to 1.85 from 2.35. But of the 2.35 movies I have I never zoom in .

Jan 16, 2007 – Re: 16:9 vs 2.35:1 vs 2.40:1 . . Why? . . I have a small number of 1.85:1. But even these show small gaps top & bottom (unless you .

3 posts - 2 authors - Last post: Mar 18So, I have 2 questions: 1) would you all want to have a 1.85 and 2.35 letterboxed aspect ratio option in the af100? and. . It's 1920x1038 vs. 1920x1080, so it'd only be 21 pixels off the top and bottom. 2.35 would be a .

6 posts - 2 authors - Last post: Mar 1Framing in 2.35 vs. 1.85. Post by MarcVanOsdale » Sun Feb 20, 2011 5:57 am. Hey Roger I've noticed that in some of your films that you like .

In other words they can be either 1.33:1 or 1.85:1. If another size is needed such as 2.35:1 then they will squish the picture on the DVD itself so that .

1 post - 1 author - Last post: Jun 12, 2003Does anyone have any good information on converting between PAL, and NTSC aspect ratios (specifically figuring the vertical)?

4:3 vs. 16:9. atan 3/4 = 36.87 deg, cos 36.87 = .8 (width), sin 36.87 = .6 . atan 1/1.85 = 28.39 deg, sin 28.39 = .475 (height) atan 1/2.35 = 23.05 deg, .

. Star,USA,07/06/1994,Paramount,,,,1.85:1,2.35:1,,2,No,No,Thick keep case,,, . ,,,,1.85:1,,,1,No,No,Snap Case,,,,, 097361197562,Monsters VS Aliens,DVD,, .

THE THING/MOTHRA VS. GODZILLA Simitar Entertainment vs. Classic Media 87 Minutes . 1964. 2.35:1 / 2.35:1 / 1.85:1. Color. Directed By Ishiro Honda .

32 posts - 15 authors - Last post: Jun 6Now, I understand 1.33 vs 1.85 vs 2.35. . But why 2.37? 2.40? 2.2? Heck .

7 posts - 5 authors - Last post: Nov 11, 2001Don't forget that 1.85 and 2.35 contain the same resolution. The letterboxing present in each still counts as lines of resolution, .

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View

The American version (GODZILLA VS. THE THING) is NOT in 2.35:1 scope, but in 1.85 which means some cropping is involved. Now…after one hears the story as to .

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View

In American cinemas, the common projection ratios are 1.85:1 and 2.40:1. . . are actually 2.39, but often referred to as 2.35 anyway, due to old convention. . . The reason for DSLR image sensors being the flatter 3:2 versus the taller .

Mar 17, 2006 – That's true, but the question is getting rid of the 2.35 format. How much more would only 1.85 formatted movies add to the DVD sales vs. .

NTSC – Aspect Ratio vs. Resolution. PAL vs. NTSC - Aspect Ratio vs. Resolution . 720 x 430 = 309600. 1.85:1. 720 x 414 = 298080. 2.35:1 .

Mar 6, 2000 – But there are two "standardized" ratios that are by far the .

50 posts - 31 authors - Last post: Oct 26, 2003Also, what I am doing is actually keeping a log of how many hours I've spent viewing 1.85 vs. 2.35. Right now it's like 70% vs. .

KHX6400D2/2G, 2GB DDR2 800MHz Non-ECC CL5, 5-5-5-15, 1.85V, (Datasheet) · BUY . KHX9200D2/1G, 1GB DDR2 1150MHz Non-ECC CL 5, 5-5-5-15, 2.3-2.35V .

What is the difference in 2.35:1 format VS. 1.85:1 fomat. Thanks.

Jun 21, 2010 – . wave this time – it's going be with us, peacefully co-existing along with 2D as another format (like 1.85 vs. 2.35 or film vs. digital). .

Calculate image dimension (in pixels) from total number of pixels and aspect ratio. Aspect Ratio: square 5:4 4:3 16:10 16:9 1.85 2.35. Pixels: .

1 answer - Jan 17, 2009The ratio differences are usually 1.33 (4:3) vs 1.78 (16:9) vs 2.35 (will show letterboxed on a 16:9 screen). If a DVD says its 1.85 though .

37 posts - 16 authors - Last post: Aug 24, 2008I am concerned that this could be a major decision for a feature film, and that I don't have the background to weigh the pros and cons .

Mar 6, 2000 – Widescreen vs. Full Frame (1.85:1 Ratio Films) Scope (2.35:1) films aren't the only ones to suffer from full frame presentation. .

The term "widescreen" typically refers to any aspect ratio greater than about 1.33:1. Academy (1.85:1) and Scope (2.35:1) compared to 4:3 (1.33:1) .

So whether a movie has an aspect ratio of 1.78:1, 1.85:1, or 2.35:1, . Compared to storing 854*480 on disk, storing 720*480 reduces file size while .

Mar 27, 2007 – Should you use the 2.35 screen format in your home theater? . For example, the movie Chicago was done in 1.85. . the 2.35 format is that it can have a more dramatic appearance compared to standard 16:9 widescreen. .

20 posts - 11 authors - Last post: Mar 25, 2002NTSC Anamorphic 1.85:1 vs 2.35:1 DVD's One click suites for DVD backup and .

10 posts - 6 authors - Last post: Aug 8, 2005Anamorphic or not, using a 16:9 set, how is a 1.85:1 transfer of a 2.35:1 (or wider) film NOT just a wider Pan & Scan?

Filming everything at 1.85 :1 (FLAT) compared to 2.35 :1 (SCOPE) may make everyone who hates black bars on their widescreen TV happy,but defeats the .

RU1, 30-7, Rubin Kazan, vs, Anzhi Makhachkala, 2, 7.3, 1.85, 3.20, 4.40. SCP, 30 -7, Inverness, vs, Hibernian, 1, 21.4, 2.35, 3.25, 2.85 .

7 posts - 5 authors - Last post: May 5First post. Be gentle. I've searched the forums but was unable to find an answer . A few months ago I saw Black Swan in a theater and was v.

27 posts - 12 authors - Last post: Jun 7, 2002[Archive] NTSC Anamorphic 1.85:1 vs 2.35:1 DVD's One click suites for DVD backup and DVD creation.

Jun 25, 2010 – 2.35:1 Constant Image Height Tutorial. Now, on with the show! 1.78:1 vs. 1.85:1. Q: Why is it that some movies labeled as "1.85:1" fill my .

Jan 9, 2009 – Is it just me, or does anybody else see a better picture quality from a movie displayed with an Aspect Ratio of 1.85:1 vs. 2.35:1?

From that point until the early 1970s a standard of 2.35:1 was used; however, . These matted films are not necessarily 2.40:1, but are most likely 1.85:1. .

Sitemap