SDNY LOCAL RULES 6.3

May 17, 12
Other articles:
  • 273/ Local rules frequently require motions to certify that the movant . 6.3.B.1.
  • Sep 30, 2011 . Although the pending motion is styled as a Rule 42 motion for bifurcation, the .
  • (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 28, 2003). The standards set forth in both Local Rule 6.3 and Fed.
  • Nov 18, 2009 . 2d 269, 280 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) (“A court must narrowly construe and strictly apply.
  • According to Local Civil Rule 6.3, reconsideration is warranted only on “matters
  • Local Civil Rule 6.3 is "strictly applied so as to avoid repetitive arguments on . ..
  • Aug 18, 2009 . Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) and Southern District of New York Local Rule 6.3.
  • Under the applicable local rule in the Southern District of New York, Local Civil
  • Aug 16, 1999 . The standards governing Rule 59(e) and Local Rule 6.3 are the same. See
  • The Courts have adopted revisions to the Local Rules of the United States District
  • S.D.N.Y. Local Civ. R. 6.3; see also Nat' l Cong. for Puerto Rican Rights v. City of.
  • TRIBUNAL: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York [federal court
  • under S.D.N.Y. Local Rule 6.3 are “extraordinary” remedies involving “
  • SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK . Motions for reconsideration are
  • Local Rules of United States District Courts for the Southern . To view the Local
  • DISCUSSION. I. Standard of Review. Motions for reconsideration in the Southern
  • 0615 PKC, 2007 WL 1098698 (S.D.N.Y. April 10, 2007) . . 3. Rules. LOCAL
  • Jul 7, 2011 . (S.D.N.Y. 1999)); accord Local Civil Rule 6.3 (authorizing motion for
  • LEXIS 13950 *10 (S.D.N.Y. September 12, 1997)(Sweet, J.)(“To permit
  • 988, 991 (E.D.N.Y. 1987)). Local Civil Rule 6.3 provides for reconsideration of a
  • matters or controlling precedent that were presented to it on the underlying
  • Feb 5, 2004 . 03 Cr. 303, 2003 WL 22083420, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 9, 2003). However, other
  • Jul 23, 2004 . 22083420, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 9,2003). However, other judges in this district
  • In re Worldcom, Inc. Sec. Litig., 308 F. Supp. 2d 214, 224 (S.D.N.Y. 2004). See
  • 08-CV-3163, 2009 WL 205050, at *1 n.1 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 27, 2009). UNITED .
  • Searching for Sdny Local Rule 6.3? Discover and compare hundreds of sources
  • . DISTRICT COURT. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK . . Rules ofthe
  • Sep 12, 1997 . CORE TERMS: Local Rule, reargument, reconsideration, statute of . Trust Funds
  • Defendants' corollary argument that Southern District of New York Local Rule 6.3
  • submit this memorandum of law pursuant to Rule 6.3 of the Local Rules for the
  • Jan 23, 2012 . 170, 2007 WL 1346652, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. May 7, 2007) ("Motions for
  • Local Rule 6.3. See Wilson v. Pessah, No. 05-CV-3143, 2007 U.S.. Dist. LEXIS
  • P. 59(3) and S.D.N.Y. Local Rule 6.3, to reargue and to alter or amend this
  • On June 14, 2007, pursuant to Local Rule 6.3 and Rule 54(b), Plaintiffs filed this
  • SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK . reconsideration, pursuant to Local Civil
  • 1176122, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. May 18, 2005). Under Local Rule 6.3, “[t]he standard for
  • . to Rule 6.3 of the Local Rules of the Southern District of New . 6.3 should be
  • 690 (MBM), 2000 WL 98057, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 18, 2000) (citation omitted).
  • 271, 1997 WL 379683 (S.D.N.Y. 1997) (“Allendale I”). Plaintiff now moves for
  • Mar 15, 2010 . 12101, 2004 WL 516212, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2004). The goal of Local Rule
  • 2d 390, 392 (S.D.N.Y.. 2000) ) (alteration in original) ; see also S .D.N.Y. Local.
  • (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). Local Rule 6.3
  • Motion for a New Trial or to Alter or Amend the Judgment (Rule 59) . . . . . . . 139.
  • Oct 20, 2010 . 125 E.D.N.Y. Standing Orders Conversion Table . . .. [Source: Former Local Civil
  • Oct 8, 2010 . (ERISA) Litig., 2010 WL 3448194 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 27, 2010). Alternatively, they
  • Although a motion for re-argument under Local Rule 6.3 “is not one of those . .
  • Local Rule 6.3 is identical, in all material respects, to former Local Rule 3(j). .
  • SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK . now moves for reconsideration
  • Nov 19, 2010 . 2010 WL 4065603 (E. D. N. Y. ) Friday, 19 November 2010 10:12 United .
  • Pursuant to Local Rule 6.3, a party may request reconsideration if counsel

  • Sitemap