Another important conceptual advantage of the copy theory over the trace theory

Section 4 examines Chomsky's (1995) answer to the question, which invokes an

Chomsky's (2001) INCLUSIVENESS Condition. In the present paper, we thus

Chomsky (1995, 2000, 2001) defines a chain as sequence of occurrences of a

Inclusiveness condition. GENERAL: Condition that the output of a system does

From a minimalist perspective, another conceptual advantage of the copy theory

It will be argued that the Inclusiveness Condition and the No-tampering Condition

Condition (Chomsky, 1995: 228). (6). Inclusiveness Condition. Any structure

Chomsky presents MP as a program, not as a theory, following Imre Lakatos's

From a minimalist perspective, a 'perfect language' should meet the '

No new elements could be added during a syntactic derivation. Inclusiveness

In the Minimalist Program Chomsky also introduces the inclusiveness condition. (

THE FACT THAT, EVEN IF WE HAVE CHOMSKY'S PERMISSION TO DISCUSS

The Inclusiveness Condition in (24) is essentially that of Chomsky (1995), but

It in fact violates the inclusiveness condition (Chomsky 1995), which states that

In this way it seems clear that PF operations violate the Inclusiveness Condition (

With the rise of the Minimalist Program and its Inclusiveness Condition,

Chomsky (1965 and later) emphasizes the descriptive and explanatory adequacy

The first path to derive the notion of phase, which Chomsky has chosen, departs

malist Program by the Inclusiveness Condition: “no new features are introduced

Secondly, it avoids a potential violation of a LJG principle which Chomsky terms

The Inclusiveness Condition (Chomsky, 1995:228) as a goal for minimalist the-.

Mar 27, 2001 . 297), 10.1. The strong minimalist thesis (Chomsky 1998) . meaning). c. The

In a syntax meeting the Inclusiveness Condition (Chomsky 1995), hence without

and, as such, violate the Inclusiveness Condition. Chomsky (1993) demonstrates

The four phenomena: In (1), we find Chomsky's (2000) version of the

of this approach is that it avoids a violation of the Inclusiveness Condition (

In this paper, adopting the derivational perspective of Chomsky's (1995; . that

It is called the “Inclusiveness Condition.” Chomsky (2001a:2) says, ". . . the

Jun 25, 2011 . the copy theory is provided by the Inclusiveness Condition (see Chomsky 1995),

(3) Last Resort (LR; e.g. Chomsky 1995): Movement must result in feature

Chomsky (1995b) is very clear that the Inclusiveness Condition provides one cri-

Chomsky (2008) proposes that this relation should be reduced to an instance of

characteristics of Japanese relative clauses, but due to the Inclusiveness

(C) The inclusiveness condition: No new features are introduced by CHL . As a

these features as the derivation proceeds would violate the inclusiveness

feed a derivation (the inclusiveness condition; see Chomsky (1994:8,. 1995:228))

clear that PF operations violate the Inclusiveness Condition (cf. Chomsky 1995,

not only complies with Chomsky's (1995) Inclusiveness Condition, but also

Chomsky writes: Each linguistic expression generated by the I-language . (iii)

Feb 15, 2009 . Proposed in Chomsky (1995:225) as a condition met by the . A language which

One important assumption in the minimalist program, initially formulated by

Sep 30, 2011 . Inclusiveness Condition, as defined in Chomsky 1995 and other work in the

underpinning for the revival of the copy theory is provided by the Inclusiveness

The Inclusiveness Condition also plays a major role in the MP in its attempt to

Identifiers (inclusiveness condition, Chomsky 95) among which a finite set of

Apr 29, 2005 . The peripheral EPP violates the Inclusiveness Condition (Chomsky 2001a, 2): (7)

This constraint is also known as the Inclusiveness Condition. (5) Inclusiveness

On the conceptual side, it is reasoned that the presence of features such as [topic

may be even more deeply grounded in physical law” (Chomsky 1965, p.59). . .

Sitemap